Advertising on the portal

AIDS and HIV are the biggest lies of the 20th century. AIDS doesn't exist? Problem with three unknowns

Does HIV infection even exist? - this question has worried a large number of scientists for many decades. From the moment the world community was struck by the news about the causative agent of the disease, which is introduced into the immune system, the opinion of scientists was divided into several groups. Each of them has its own statements about the disease AIDS and methods of its treatment and prevention.

In each of the groups, the main question is “is there HIV?” If it is not there, then how does such a disease develop and why, for almost 40 years that the world has known about the existence of immunodeficiency, the true cause of this disease is not known, an effective treatment has not been invented and an effective preventive remedy for the pathological condition has not been developed. All this together has given rise to many myths about HIV (AIDS).

Does HIV exist? If the world has developed tests to determine the virus in the blood, then the answer to the question: does HIV really exist is clearly positive. What if HIV does not exist, and the disease it causes is just a genetic abnormality that scientists carefully hide? In any option, there is a lot of evidence that has its pros and cons. But everything needs to be understood in order and carefully in order to understand all the mechanisms. Regarding the question: is HIV a myth or reality, the opinions of scientists are divided even today.

Why doesn't HIV exist?

At that moment, when the world already knew about the causative agent of the infection and the changes it causes in the human body, many studies were carried out in different countries. Millions of people have been screened for the presence of immunodeficiency virus in their blood. The main clinical symptoms were also determined; in each case, the pathology proceeded in stages of different durations, which was determined by the state of the immune system in a particular patient.

In countries in western Africa, scientists found entire settlements of people who suffered from a disease very similar to AIDS, but they did not find the retrovirus in their blood. From that moment on, doubt crept in about whether HIV (AIDS) actually exists, because there are many people in the world whose test results were negative at the beginning of the development of the disease. And positive results appeared only when the disease was at its peak, and it was almost impossible to help the person.

Evidence against the idea that AIDS does not exist came a little later. It was determined that the virus has many types, and the strain that was identified first was called HIV 1. The type identified some time later in the inhabitants of Guinea was called HIV 2.

AIDS does not exist: confessions of honest doctors and scientists

One of the groups of scientists who monitor the dynamics of the development of immunodeficiency is of the opinion that HIV (AIDS) does not exist. The evidence that confirms this fact is based on the fact that the virus is not cultivated on ordinary media and does not obey the main laws of the epidemiological process. All methods that are used to prevent and reduce the number of infected people do not change the state of the AIDS epidemic in the world.

In connection with this indisputable evidence, it was concluded that HIV infection does not exist and AIDS is just a genetic disease.

The great lie of doctors: AIDS does not exist

For many decades, planet Earth has been overpopulated with humanity. Human life lasts for more than 7 decades and is maintained through medical care with little to no difficulty. Multiple vaccinations have protected people from diseases that previously affected entire communities, killing more than a quarter of the world's population. Hence a large number of natural disasters, millions of people suffer from hunger and lack of food. Therefore, the world elite entered into an agreement with scientists.

This document stated that a certain factor is needed that will not respond to standard medical treatment and can cause death in patients leading an unhealthy lifestyle. Based on this agreement, scientists invented a disease that was sexually transmitted and through the use of unsterile instruments. As a result, this pathology progresses among the population, affecting drug addicts, prostitutes and people who use their services to a greater extent.

Despite the seemingly truthful hoax of HIV, to which there is no counteraction, the infection fulfills its tasks. Indeed, during the existence of the retrovirus on planet Earth, more than 50 million people died from this disease. And every year the prevalence of the disease increases, but no cure has been found, despite the huge amount of research and money invested.

Based on this theory, it is impossible to specifically answer the question: is there AIDS or not? But we can assume that this disease did not appear on the planet so easily and it performs a certain function in relation to the existence of humanity.

Does AIDS exist or is it a myth?

The disease AIDS exists, there are many facts about it. For example, that upon contact with an infected person, a healthy person also becomes infected with this disease. This suggests that there is an infecting factor, and this is most likely a viral agent.

HIV doesn't exist! A fact that supports this opinion is that no one has ever seen the virus in person. And all assumptions about its structure and development in the body are just a theory, which is only partly confirmed by relevant evidence.

The fact that AIDS does not exist is also evidenced by another indisputable fact. Not all infected people end up with AIDS. Scientists attribute this to the fact that a small percentage of the world's population has strong immunity, which until the last moment restrains the immunodeficiency virus and does not allow secondary infection to affect organs and systems. Based on this, the answer to the question: does AIDS exist is definitely positive. But how can the body fight diseases if the pathogen completely destroys the immune system? This discrepancy remains a mystery.

Of course, it cannot be said that AIDS is the great hoax of the 20th century. What is convincing about this is that the disease is just a statement of the fact that immunity has decreased to a critical level after the dawn of infection in the human body, which leads to the well-known clinical picture.

Who invented AIDS?

One of the probable facts that reveals the mystery of the existence of the disease is the opinion that the pathogen was invented in one of the US military laboratories. Initially, it was supposed to be a virus that infects the population en masse, spreads quickly upon contact with a healthy person and then infects others. But during the research, a serious mistake was made, as a result of which the virus entered the world of humanity and caused an epidemic known to the population of most countries of the world.

Is there HIV infection in countries where the main factors of transmission of immunodeficiency are not common? In world practice, there are statistics that the disease is spreading among people who abuse injecting drugs and have many sexual partners. In Arab countries, where outside sex is not encouraged by religion, and the use of drugs, even alcohol, is considered a sin, there are also cases of infection.

In these states, there is no question about whether HIV is fiction or reality, because at the state level the disease is prohibited and the fight against it is taking place at a high level. Recorded cases of pathology in Arab states are associated with homosexual relations of some men. But the spread of this infection in eastern countries is very slow, which is most likely due to the way of life and the observance of ancient traditions of communication between men and women.

HIV (AIDS) - the greatest hoax of the century

Due to the fact that immunodeficiency was first identified in people who had homosexual sex, there is a group of scientists who prove: AIDS is a myth. When analyzing the question: HIV (AIDS) - myth or reality, one should take into account what changes the immune system undergoes after the immunodeficiency virus enters the body.

Although some scientists consider HIV a hoax of the 20th century, it has been proven that after pathogenic microflora enters the body, it penetrates cells and causes genetic changes there that help the virus produce daughter virions to infect healthy structures further. Cells of the immune system perceive all affected elements as antigens and kill them. And from a certain point, the immune status begins to perceive other healthy structures as affected and also begins to fight them.

Myths about HIV infection claim that due to homosexual relations, men expose their bodies to foreign proteins contained in semen. The rectum contains many vessels that absorb remaining water into the blood. This is necessary to combat dehydration, which often affects people. It is through these vessels that foreign protein enters the body’s circulatory system in the form of motile sperm, which have the goal of getting closer and uniting with any cell in their path. This leads to changes in the genetic information of immune cells and disruption of their function, respectively.

The next question that arises from this conclusion is: how then is the infection transmitted heterogeneously? Most women who become infected through sexual contact also have many other sexually transmitted diseases. They are accompanied by wounds and ulcerations on the vaginal mucosa. It is through these damages that sperm penetrates the patient’s blood, causing changes in the body.

There are a huge number of myths about HIV infection, but which of these are true? Is HIV really a 21st century hoax and nothing more? Perhaps immunodeficiency is a natural selection, but everyone can protect themselves from it using mechanical protection.

In a wonderful story that reveals the essence of the deception of the peoples of the planet with the story of the AIDS virus, the main narrator is Dear in the medical world scientist, dr. James Curran (whose academic biography is posted). In the ensuing controversy leading up to the post, the debate was mainly about the existence of the HIV virus.

The virus really exists and there is a lot of irrefutable evidence of this. However not him causes AIDS. Doctors still cannot understand this issue, so we will have to work for them, relying on... common sense and facts.

Firstly, Luc Montagnier, one of the discoverers of the HIV virus, himself admitted, after 25 (!) years old, what HIV is not the main cause of AIDS.

Secondly, a strange pathogen of some kind, AIDS. According to Dr. Koch, whose conclusion is confirmed by millions of facts, an infectious pathogen must not only be released from an infected organism, but, introduced into a healthy body, must infect it.

In the case of AIDS, a certain virus, the HIV virus, is actually isolated. But people who are diagnosed with it may not get sick at all for many, many years. Moreover, according to research by a professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, 15,000 examined wives of husbands infected with the HIV virus, who continued to lead a normal sex life with the latter, did not have this virus at all! So, excuse me, the HIV virus - is it infectious or what? A little bit infectious, right? Or maybe this virus has nothing to do with it at all, but belongs to the so-called category. satellite viruses?

Thirdly, the very statistics of HIV-infected people are very significant. According to Duesberg, 90% of those infected are, for some reason, male drug addicts and male pederasts. Common sense protests. After all, if you take any other infectious disease, then its carrier infects all people approximately equally: men, women, children, pensioners, trade union members, etc. To this official health care answers us that HIV infection occurs through blood.

Let's say. Everything is clear about homosexual men. What about drug addicts? Don't they have sex with women? Or do only drug addicts catch the virus through contaminated syringes, and it has no effect on drug addicts? Tell me, can’t women and children become infected due to the negligence of health workers from dirty syringes?

Common sense suggests the following logical chain of reasoning. They discovered AIDS, then almost a hundred years later, isolated the HIV virus. Before the discovery of the virus, condoms were practically not used, at least when they wanted to conceive a child. In Europe and America, the population increased by 500 million people during this period.

Let's talk. There was AIDS in the early 20th century, but people continued to reproduce. Even if at the beginning of this period they were quite chaste, but after two world wars soldiers alone had to infect millions of women with AIDS. And later the sexual revolution took place in the West, drugs flowed like a river. Those. The number of women affected by AIDS should be approximately equal to the number of men affected. But the numbers say the opposite: only 10% women, but 90% are men.

Imagine if some kind of epidemic occurred in Europe and America, and the disease was incurable. In a hundred years, how many people do you think will get sick? By the end of the century, no one would get sick. Just there would be no healthy people left.

Fourthly, what is surprising is that it is mostly poor people who get AIDS. Or Africans. Is the virus so selective that it attacks the poor and leaves the rich alone? Of course, one can argue here that the poor do not have money for a condom. Yes, the argument...

Fifthly, there is no single diagnosis for the presence of the HIV virus. Conducting tests onantibody content, but not to identify the virus itself. But many real diseases, the list of which includes at least three dozen, give a similar picture to antibodies. For example, with tuberculosis, pneumonia, rheumatism, after suffering from the flu, etc. These are diseases that lead to the production the same antibodies, as with HIV disease.

In principle, a couple of any of the listed points are more than enough to doubt the imposed chain of HIV virus - AIDS. But there is another one serious moment which the inventors of HIV-AIDS are trying, but they can't sweep it away. These are the opinions of scientists about this very causality. Official medicine and no less official science are trying in every possible way to discredit such scientists and find faults. Sometimes it works, but not always.

As an example, let us mention some scientists who believe that the HIV virus is no more dangerous to humans than many thousands of other safe viruses that a person constantly carries in his body.

About the doctor James Curran we already mentioned at the beginning of the article. Dear scientist, no compromising evidence.
Heinz Ludwig Sänger, former professor of virology and microbiology at the Max Planck Institute for Biochemistry, Munich, Germany.

Etienne de Harvin(Etienne de Harven), former professor of pathology at the University of Toronto (Canada). It was not possible to find incriminating evidence.

Scientists from Perth group” Queen's University, an Australian court, 20 years after their work on the lack of a connection between HIV and AIDS, found them... incompetent. Those. lawyers discussed the competence of scientists, geneticists, biologists...

Nobel laureate Kary Mulisa, who declared "If the conventional theory is correct and AIDS is real is caused by the human immunodeficiency virus, then there must be scientific facts, confirming this theory. There are no such facts." - simply declared to be obsessed with conspiracy theories.

Experiments Roberto Giraldo(Roberto A. Giraldo), MD, specialist in internal medicine, infectious diseases, tropical infections, technologist, laboratory of clinical immunology and molecular diagnostics, Cornell Medical Center, New York - was simply accused of conducting incorrect experiments.

A Peter Duesberg(Peter Duesberg), a professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California, whom we quoted above, was accused of envy of another discoverer of the HIV virus, Moore, who worked together.

Although Duesberg, in addition to excellent work with disease statistics, working under the same conditions as Moore, proposed his own scheme in which our virus plays the role of a satellite virus. Which has no effect on the development of AIDS.

Below are several pictures from the book Seth C. Kalichman, professor of psychology, specialist in statistics of AIDS and sexual behavior in society. The book is just describes the works of P. Duesberg.


The HIV virus is a harmless companion virus. He entered the cage and remained there, without causing harm to others. AIDS is the result of a weakened immune system by an unhealthy lifestyle.


And this is the official diagram, from which it is clear that the virus penetrates a cell, then multiplies in it and leaves it, attacking neighboring ones. More precisely, judging by the statistics, mostly neighboring men, practically avoiding women.


According to Duesberg, the virus in the cell is successfully destroyed by antibodies. But the drugs themselves, poor nutrition, toxins, dirty water, taking anti-AIDS medications, all this causes weakening and even destruction of the immune system.


According to the official version, antibodies are not capable of infecting the harmful HIV virus. And the last one for years virtually no external symptomsremains in the body, slowly destroying its immune system. Everything would be fine in this version, but the tests are not able to identify the malicious agent. They only look at the production of antibodies, which can be caused by various reasons, as described above.

Sixth, what is this anyway, AIDS? This is a syndrome, i.e. a set of signs. Signs of what? The body's immune system does not function well enough. But here common sense simply protests before the imposition of the only version that the HIV virus is main culprit such a sad state of the body.

Protests because such influence in general not proven! But it is well known and indisputable that food with chemical preservatives, dirty water, unsanitary living conditions, stress, living in cities, smog, acid rain, etc. - all this causes a weakening of the human immune system. Paroxysm of lies official medicine: the same weakening, sometimes fatal, causes... AZT - Zidovudine ( antiretroviral drug for the treatment of HIV infection )!

As we see, based only on common sense, using some statistics, opinions scientists, we come to the obvious conclusion: the AIDS virus is another large-scale liberal lies, designed, in addition to generating super-profits, to help reduce the population on the planet.

Instead of solving issues with improving the quality of life of people and strengthening their morality, the processes launched have the opposite direction: lowering people to the level of animals and selectively managing the size of the formed herd. Us with you.

Finally, a film-story about the Great Liberal Deception: the evil AIDS virus, remarkable in content and exceptionally strong in emotional and moral terms.

Why was the AIDS virus invented? How to explain the epidemics of this non-existent HIV virus in African countries. Why is Africa starving at all if in America farmers are paid extra so that they do not produce more food?

The story of the AIDS virus that doesn't actually cause AIDS. How so? And so: in 1996, a fundamental study by Professor Peter Duesberg was published entitled “Inventing the AIDS Virus” with a foreword by Nobel Prize laureate Kari Mullins (Peter H. Duesberg “Inventing the AIDS virus”). Peter Duesberg, a professor of molecular and cellular biology at the University of California at Berkeley, published it with his own money, since PR refused to do so. Professor Duzberg is one of the very few people on the globe who, as part of his career, has spent his entire life studying retroviruses - that is, the family of viruses to which the “AIDS virus” belongs. There are 700 pages in Duzberg's book. This is a thick book, but it is so interesting that it reads like a detective story - in one gulp. Professor Dusberg shows step by step how the legend was created that a small retrovirus is the source of great misfortunes, for which very specific people are actually responsible. In fact, the “AIDS virus” is a saprophyte, that is, like, say, the microbe “Escherichia coli”, it is present in the body of any person, namely in the nasopharynx. What do AIDS patients die from? - from this retrovirus? - No, they die from a variety of complications caused by completely different, very specific microbes and fungi. So why then is a retrovirus blamed? - They say that it is this that causes reduced immunity? Professor Duzberg shows that the retrovirus is in everyone’s nasopharynx and does not cause any AIDS in anyone - that is, that the slandered “AIDS virus” is part of the normal human microbial flora, and, therefore, beneficial for the body.

Do you know the fact that not a single wife of an AIDS patient has ever become infected by having sex with him? Why don't you know this? Probably PR? How is this possible if the disease is infectious? Where did all these stories come from, how someone somewhere pricked himself with a needle in a hospital and became infected, receiving millions of dollars in compensation. Don’t you think that these are all easily adjustable things? Yes, that's a lie! It is a lie that a person became infected from a needle prick.

The real situation is this: yes, there is Reduced Immunity Syndrome, which, by the way, has always existed, but only in recent decades has it become catastrophically widespread. There is one obvious fact - that not a single person has yet died from AIDS caused by a small retrovirus. The virus has been slandered. People die from pneumonia and cancer associated with low immunity, and the retrovirus, the “AIDS virus,” has nothing to do with it. Then what, you ask, causes a decrease in immunity? - And the answer to this is simple, listen carefully and remember: A decrease in human immunity is a general trend of modern humanity associated with the catastrophic poisoning of the human environment over the past decades. Toxic substances and factors have overwhelmed modern humanity or, as they say, civilization. These toxic factors include polluted air, water, food - everything that is outside and gets inside a person or even comes into contact with him, such as, for example, even synthetic clothing. The fact that they are trying to hide is that we all, city dwellers, have Reduced Immunity Syndrome. Yes, to some extent, we all, city residents, have AIDS - Reduced Immunodeficiency Syndrome. But why then do only some die? And this is where the risk factor plays a role, that is, the fact that some people expose themselves to much more intoxication than others: these are drug addicts, drunkards, leading a riotous and disorderly lifestyle, that is, the group that is reflected in official statistics .

But how can we explain that half of Africa suffers from AIDS, that is, has immunodeficiency? It’s very simple: Africa does not have its own agriculture, it is a dependent of the world. They do not sow or plow, but only eat and reproduce. Their culture has not yet reached the agricultural level. They can only eat what grows on trees. Previously, natural causes regulated the number of Africans. Now civilization does not allow them to die just like that, it forces them to die from immunodeficiency. The scheme works like this: as you understand, Africans don’t have money to pay for anything. Thus, in order to make a profit, American corporations make this roundabout move: PR scares the world community with stories about famine in Africa and forces the government, that is, the American taxpayer, to fork out for food for Africans. American corporations take the money, and as humanitarian aid, naturally, do not supply high-quality products to Africa, but sell them low-quality, expired, non-nutritious, at best empty, and simply contaminated food products, saturated with malignant chemicals, according to the “gifted” principle. Don’t look a horse in the mouth.” Thus, what American corporations are doing is simply genocide.

You may say, but then Africans would still die of hunger. - This is the wrong way to pose the question: in Africa, natural factors have always regulated the population, but natural factors do not provide any profit to American corporations - this is the reason for AIDS in Africa. That's right, Africa is a direct global case of targeted poisoning of people across the continent with toxic substances distributed as counterfeit foods and medicines. Who controls the quality of products supplied to Africa? - Nobody. Now do you understand why PR needed a small retrovirus? - To write off responsibility for the quite obvious fact of the murder of tens, and maybe hundreds of millions of people, as well as for the obvious catastrophic state of health of modern man.

An interesting fact, Professor Duzberg emphasizes that the consistent deterioration in the health of people with immunodeficiency (that would be more correct to say), and not AIDS, is caused by the start of taking medications intended specifically for its treatment, which - in particular, the main drug "AZT" - are extremely toxic for the human body. That is, death from AIDS is actually death from chronic intoxication of the body caused by environmental factors, water, food, air and intoxication factors individual for each person, as well as the drugs themselves used to treat it - the language does not dare to name them medications.

How else is this proven? - Because there have been accumulated documented cases of complete recovery from “AIDS” of people who had already been thrown into the dying ward by official medicine. (Roger's Recovery from AIDS Bob Owen. "Roger's Recovery from AIDS." Author - Bob Owen, with the subtitle "How one man conquered a terrible disease" - you can find this book on the Internet).

Tim O'Shea, from the book “The doors of perception: why Americans will believe almost everything”

Per. from English John Galepeno

Addition:

LIST OF REASONS FOR FALSE POSITIVE HIV ANTIBODY TEST RESULTS

1. Healthy people due to obscure cross-reactions

2. Pregnancy (especially in a woman who has given birth many times)

3. Normal human ribonucleoproteins

4. Blood transfusions, especially multiple blood transfusions

5. Upper respiratory tract infection (colds, acute respiratory infections)

7. Recent viral infection or viral vaccination

8. Other retroviruses

9. Flu vaccination

10. Vaccination against hepatitis B

11. Tetanus vaccination

12. “Sticky” blood (among Africans)

13. Hepatitis

14. Primary sclerosing cholangitis

15. Primary biliary cirrhosis

16. Tuberculosis

17. Herpes

18. Hemophilia

19. Stevens/Johnson syndrome (inflammatory febrile disease of the skin and mucous membranes)

20. Q-fever with concomitant hepatitis

21. Alcoholic hepatitis (alcoholic liver disease)

22. Malaria

23. Rheumatoid arthritis

24. Systemic lupus erythematosus

25. Scleroderma

26. Dermatomyositis

27. Connective tissue disease

28. Malignant tumors

29. Lymphoma

30. Myeloma

31. Multiple sclerosis

32. Kidney failure

33. Alpha interferon therapy for hemodialysis

34. Organ transplantation

35. Kidney transplantation

36. Leprosy

37. Hyperbilirubinemia (increased bilirubin in the blood)

38. Lipemic serum (blood high in fat or lipids)

39. Hemolyzed serum (blood in which hemoglobin is separated from red cells)

40. Naturally occurring antibodies

41. Anti-carbohydrate antibodies

42. Anti-lymphocyte antibodies

43. HLA antibodies (to leukocyte antigens class 1 and 2)

44. High level of circulating immune complexes

45. Samples subjected to high temperature treatment

46. ​​Anti-collagen antibodies (found in homosexual men, hemophiliacs, Africans of both sexes and people with leprosy)

47. Serum positivity for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody (both found in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune diseases)

48. Hypergammaglobulinemia (high level of antibodies)

49. False positive response to another test, including the RPR (Rapid Plasma Reagent) test for syphilis

50. Anti-smooth muscle antibodies

51. Anti-parietal cell antibodies (parietal cells of the gastric glands)

52. Anti-hepatitis A immunoglobulin M (antibody)

53. Anti-Hbc immunoglobulin M

54. Antimitochondrial antibodies

55. Antinuclear antibodies

56. Antimicrosomal antibodies

57. Antibodies to T-cell leukocyte antigens

58. Antibodies with high affinity to polystyrenes, which are used in test systems

59. Proteins on filter paper

60. Visceral leishmaniasis

61. Epstein-Barr virus

62. Receptive anal sex

(September 1996, Zengers, California)

Such a huge number of conditions that give a positive reaction to a supposedly specific test indicates its absolute unreliability and the impossibility of using it for diagnostic purposes. Every doctor prescribing HIV testing must be aware of his responsibility for causing irreparable moral damage (leading to serious consequences) to people for whom this testing gives a positive result.

And you don’t need to be afraid of the diseases listed on this list. But you need to clearly understand a simple thing: if you are diagnosed with such a disease, and during testing you turn out to be HIV-positive, then the point is not that you have AIDS, but that the HIV tests gave a positive result in connection with this disease . But even more, I want to draw your attention to the fact that many points actually boil down to points 1 and 48 - you are healthy, you just have an increased overall level of antibodies, and HIV tests react positively to this. There is no need to worry for a second about a positive HIV test result.

And the manufacturers of these tests themselves are well aware of their complete unreliability. And therefore, none of these tests are considered 100% reliable. On the contrary, the annotation for each test states that it cannot be the only basis for making a diagnosis, and its result must be confirmed by additional testing. In addition to avoiding responsibility, this immediately also increases the production and sales of the tests themselves. But this is not enough! You know that HIV testing is voluntary. But it still requires your consent, certified by your signature. And in the “Informed Consent Form” you must sign literally the following:

“I hereby declare that I will not make any claims against the medical institution and staff, including liability for issuing a false positive result.”

All positive results of HIV testing are deliberately false positive, a deliberate deception.

And with such a piece of paper you are purely psychologically prepared for the fact that when you realize that you have become a victim of deception, you should not be offended by anyone, forgive everyone, and blame only your former naivety for everything. I don’t want to write about these tests in more detail here, but in principle there is nothing supernatural or requiring an academic mind to understand that we are simply being fooled.

Every year, thousands of pregnant women become victims of HIV hoaxes, who, in violation of the principle of voluntary HIV testing, are practically forced to undergo this testing. Watch the compilation video “Conspiracy against Pregnant Women”, which convincingly shows the falsity of the HIV/AIDS theory.

Movement against the HIV/AIDS scam: http://www.odnoklassniki.ru/spida.net http://vk.com/spida_net

Video: opinion of foreign experts

People are hiding information about the falsity of the hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS, which leads to death. Data are being hidden about the uselessness and toxicity of drugs that are supposed to kill the “elusive virus” (HIV) and thereby prolong the life of an AIDS patient. In the entire history of medicine, there has never been such a monstrous deception of a huge number of people, including both patients and doctors, as the fictitious epidemic and panic associated with AIDS. The HIV/AIDS theory can be considered the biggest scam of the medical mafia...

Video: The most important thing about AIDS in 6 minutes

Joke: AIDS is the plague of the twentieth century and the runny nose of the twenty-first.

Announcement: 80% of people infected with HIV live in Africa, but over the past 30 years the population of this continent has doubled. Is the Devil called HIV so scary and does the epidemic really exist?

For the first time, an atypical manifestation of immunodeficiency in homosexual men was described in the American journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly in 1981. This year is the starting point in the history of HIV.

The virus itself was isolated in 1983 at the Pasteur Institute (France) and at the same time at the National Institutes of Health (USA), but it was the Frenchmen Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Luc Montagnier who received the 2008 Nobel Prize. for this discovery.

Epidemiology and pathogenesis

The human immunodeficiency virus belongs to the RNA-containing viruses of the Retrovirus genus, the Lentivirus family. There are two types of the virus: HIV-1, the main cause of the epidemic, and HIV-2, a less common variant mainly found in West Africa. Once entering the human body, the viral particle detects CD4 cell receptors, attaching to which it can enter the cell.

Inside the cell, the viral RNA synthesizes DNA on itself, which is integrated into the host nucleus and exists with it until the cell dies. Viral DNA synthesizes RNA for new viral particles that infect more and more cells. CD4 receptors contain cells of the nervous and immune tissues, so it is these systems that are primarily affected by HIV.

The source of HIV-1 infection is a sick person; there is a theory that HIV-1 can infect wild chimpanzees; for HIV-2, some species of African monkeys can be the reservoir. The virus is very unstable in the external environment: it does not tolerate heating and drying, any antiseptics destroy it almost instantly. HIV is present in all body fluids: tears, breast milk, spinal fluid, saliva, rectal mucus, etc., but the largest amount is found in blood, semen and vaginal secretions.

Methods of HIV transmission

Sexual. The virus is transmitted through unprotected sexual contact. Homosexual men are at greatest risk, since their way of satisfying sexual desire is the most dangerous.

Hemocontact is also parenteral. The virus is transmitted through blood transfusions, as well as through contaminated medical instruments such as syringes, or through trauma when the blood of an infected person enters the wound of an uninfected person. The main population of people infected in this way are intravenous drug addicts. They make up 70–80% of those infected with HIV in civilized countries.

Vertical. That is, from mother to fetus. Most often, an infant is infected directly during childbirth, through the mother's blood. Infection through the placenta is rare, and even more rarely the virus is transmitted through breast milk. In general, an HIV-positive mother has a 25-30% chance of having an HIV-positive baby.

HIV is not transmitted through everyday contact; kissing, handshaking and bites of blood-sucking insects are also safe.

At-risk groups

  • intravenous drug users;
  • persons, regardless of orientation, who use anal sex;
  • recipients of blood or organs;
  • medical workers;
  • persons involved in the sex industry, both prostitutes and their clients.

Symptoms and stages of HIV infection

Incubation stage

From the moment of infection until the appearance of the first symptoms of HIV infection. Usually lasts from 3 weeks to 3 months, rarely can extend to 1 year. At this time, the virus is actively introduced into cells and reproduces. There are no clinical symptoms of the disease yet, the body’s immune response has not yet been observed.

Stage of primary manifestations

Active reproduction of the virus continues, but the body is already beginning to respond to the introduction of HIV. This phase lasts about 3 months. It can occur in three ways:

  • Asymptomatic – there are no signs of the disease, but antibodies to HIV are detected in the blood.
  • Acute HIV infection - this is where the first symptoms of HIV infection appear, accompanied by an unmotivated rise in body temperature to subfebrile levels, increased fatigue, various rashes on the skin and mucous membranes, enlarged lymph nodes (usually posterior cervical, axillary, elbow), in some people it may sore throat, diarrhea occur, the spleen and liver enlarge. Blood test - decreased lymphocytes, leukocytes, thrombocytopenia. This period lasts on average from 2 weeks to 1.5 months, then passes into the latent stage.
  • Acute HIV infection with secondary diseases - sometimes in the acute phase the suppression of immunity is so strong that already at this stage HIV-associated infections (pneumonia, herpes, fungal infections, etc.) may appear.
Latent stage

All signs of the acute phase pass. The virus continues to destroy cells of the immune system, but their death is compensated by their increased production. Immunity fades slowly but constantly until the number of lymphocytes drops to a certain critical level. Previously it was believed that this stage lasted about 5 years, now this period has been increased to 10 - 20 years. This stage does not have any clinical symptoms of HIV infection.

Stage of secondary diseases or AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome)

The number of lymphocytes decreases so much that infections that otherwise would never have arisen begin to cling to a person. These diseases are called AIDS-associated infections:

  • Kaposi's sarcoma;
  • brain lymphoma;
  • candidiasis of the esophagus, bronchi or lungs;
  • cytomegalovirus infections;
  • Pneumocystis pneumonia;
  • pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis, etc.

Actually this list is long. In 1987, a WHO expert committee compiled a list of 23 diseases that are considered markers of AIDS, and the presence of the first 12 does not require immunological confirmation of the presence of the virus in the body.

Treatment of HIV infection

Modern medicine is not yet able to completely cure HIV, and a reliable vaccine has not been developed that allows for specific prevention of this disease. However, the use of antiretroviral drugs can reduce the viral load in the body and prevent the disease from progressing to the AIDS stage. Treatment must continue throughout the patient's life.

The effectiveness of combination (includes 2 or more drugs with different mechanisms of action) antiretroviral therapy has been proven in two large studies: HPTN-052 and CROI-2014. Both studies involve homosexual and heterosexual couples, where one partner is infected and takes antiretroviral drugs, while the virus is not detected in his blood, and the other is healthy.

  • HPTN-052 started in 2005, as of 2011 the probability of infection has decreased by 96%;
  • CROI-2014 started in 2011, conducted only in the USA, 40% of couples are homosexual, 280,000 heterosexual and 164,000 homosexual unprotected sexual acts were tracked, as of February 20014. Not a single documented case of infection of a sexual partner has yet been recorded.

Both studies are not yet completed, but the preliminary results are very impressive.

Alternative point of view

Money rules the world. This postulate is obvious to everyone. All major world religions condemn acquisitiveness, but this does not save humanity. Golden Taurus dominates all spheres of human activity.

In terms of profitability, medicine is right behind the arms trade, drug trafficking, casinos and prostitution, but with much less risk. Turn on the TV, half of the commercials will sell you various pills that help “for everything.”

For example, the well-known Mitsubishi corporation produces everything from cars to fountain pens (an artist I know only uses pencils from this company). So, this company includes a division of Mitsubishi Chemical, which produces medicines. It is Mitsubishi Chemical that provides half of the income of the entire corporation. It is not cars, but pills that support the well-being of Mitsubishi management.

Modern medicine has made great progress in the fight against dangerous diseases. We have defeated smallpox, almost eliminated it, and we no longer die from plague and cholera. Even cancer is not as scary for modern people as it was a hundred years ago. Doctors can successfully lower blood pressure, treat heart attacks, transplant up to 60% of organs, and make prosthetics that are no worse than real limbs. In general, markets have been dismantled, areas of activity have been divided...

Beginners in the pharmaceutical business have absolutely nothing to do. Megacorporations, which are richer than oil companies, will gobble it up one or two times. But they also need to somehow increase their income.

A few more examples. The antipyretic drug Aspirin-Bayer is taken by 50 million healthy Americans, and it supposedly saves them from heart attacks. Synthetic vitamins A and E significantly increase the risk of cancer and heart attack, despite the fact that their natural analogues are absolutely harmless.

So how can we increase farm income now? companies, if everything has already been divided and the epidemics have been eliminated? We need to invent a threat. Believe me, in the history of the 20th century there were many scams that brought fabulous profits to pharmaceutical corporations. These are synthetic vitamins that are dangerous to health), some vaccines, the already mentioned Aspirin, etc. But the most ambitious hoax is, of course, the human immunodeficiency virus, also known as HIV infection.

The US government has already spent $50 billion to fight the AIDS epidemic, yet an effective vaccine has not been created, and antiretroviral drugs kill people faster than HIV itself. 15–20% of the population of the poorest countries in Africa are declared to have AIDS, despite the fact that a monthly course of treatment for Africans costs at least 150 USD. per person. In Russia and the USA, the cost of therapy can reach up to $800 per month. Do you feel the size of the profits of the pharmaceutical cartels?

The first person to question the connection between AIDS and HIV was Peter Duesberg (the famous biologist). Back in 1987 he studied the statistics on the incidence of AIDS in the USA and found out that 90% of patients are men, and 60 - 70% of them are drug addicts, and the remaining 30% are gays who actively use all kinds of aphrodisiacs and psychostimulants; blacks make up 12% of the US population, while among About 47% of them are HIV-infected.

This behavior of the virus seemed suspicious to Duesberg. Around the same time (late 1980s), the HIV/AIDS denial movement (AIDS dissidents) emerged. Its supporters (some of them world-famous scientists and even Nobel laureates) argue that there is no connection between acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and HIV. The most radical apologists of this movement deny the very fact of the discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus.

Here are some of the postulates of AIDS dissidence:

  • Acquired immunodeficiency exists, but it is not caused by HIV, but by a host of other factors: intoxication, drug addiction, homosexuality, radiation, vaccinations, taking certain medications, malnutrition, pregnancy (in women who have given birth frequently), stress, etc.
  • Among those infected through sexual contact, the majority are homosexual men. AIDS dissidents explain this fact by the fact that male sperm introduced in an unnatural way is a powerful immunosuppressant. By the way, the symptoms of HIV infection in women and men are absolutely identical.
  • Drug addiction is very destructive to the immune system, so drug addicts die from immunodeficiency even without HIV. Drugs rapidly destroy the liver, whose functions are to neutralize toxic substances, it is involved in many types of metabolism, and if its functions are disrupted, a person can get sick and die from anything.
  • In Africa, three factors are enough to make a diagnosis of AIDS: diarrhea, exhaustion, and fever. This does not require confirmation of virus detection. Millions of Africans are dying from malnutrition, poor sanitation, tuberculosis, herpes simplex, CMV, malaria and other “diseases of poverty” due to weakened immunity, but megacorporations are trying to convince us that they are dying from AIDS.
  • Since the outbreak began, Africa's population has doubled. The most HIV-affected African country is Uganda, where about 20% of the population is allegedly infected with HIV, and is demonstrating constant population growth.
  • There is not a single disease directly related to HIV; when a person dies from AIDS, it means that he died from tuberculosis, Pneumocystis pneumonia, Salmonella sepsis, etc.
  • Duesberg himself put forward the chemical theory of AIDS; he claims that the disease is caused by drugs, as well as many drugs, including those used in the treatment of HIV, after which he became enemy No. 1 among the pharmaceutical cartels. He conducts his research with modest donations from private individuals.
  • Freddie Mercury died of AIDS in 1991, after battling the disease for 3 years, he was a homosexual and a drug addict. In the same year, American basketball player Magic Johnson announced the end of his sports career due to the discovery of HIV in his blood. He is heterosexual and has not “dabbled in drugs” - he is still alive and well.
  • Pharmaceutical companies are resisting in every way possible to reduce the cost of their products aimed at combating HIV. The market for these drugs is estimated at $500 billion per year. GlaxoSmithKline alone earns about $160 billion annually from HIV.

What’s interesting is that supporters of the classical theory do not try to logically and reasonably refute AIDS dissidents, classifying them as sectarians, and this indirectly proves that their statements are absolutely groundless, since the viral nature of the origin of AIDS is considered proven in scientific circles.

Paradoxically, the hysteria around HIV has benefited domestic healthcare. Medical workers have become more careful about sanitary and epidemiological rules, the production of disposable consumables has increased tenfold, and their attitude towards blood has changed (it has become less frivolous).

I'll add a few words of my own. Remember the story of thirty-two people being infected with HIV in Elista in 1988; I was not too lazy to find out their fate; by 2011, half of them had died. I personally know a woman who has been HIV-positive for 12 years, has ignored antiretroviral therapy, looks quite healthy and has no plans to die yet.

My personal IMHO conclusion from the above is the following: HIV exists, but its connection with AIDS is not obvious, and this problem is overly inflated by pharmaceutical cartels for selfish purposes. Ask yourself, would you have unprotected sexual intercourse with a partner who claimed to have HIV? So I wouldn’t, it’s scary...