Father of a boy who died after vaccination: “Burying a healthy child is cruel. A six-month-old child died in the Urals after falling into a coma after being vaccinated with pneumococcus. Death of an infant due to vaccination

As we told you, on October 9 in Kaluga as a result of bilateral pneumonia. His mother Larisa Barinova wrote about the tragedy on social networks. The woman believes that her son fell ill with pneumonia due to the DTP vaccination, which was given to the boy 6 days before his death, on October 3.

“My 8-month-old child died after a routine DPT vaccination! Parents!!! Think 100 times before giving your child any vaccinations, read information about them and their consequences, about those affected by them. And don't think that this won't affect you. “I thought so too,” Larisa wrote on her page on the VKontakte social network. – Moreover, they are vaccinated against diseases that are not epidemically dangerous, but are transmitted through blood. Before vaccination, the examination is done almost by eye. They do not take any tests: neither blood nor urine, which could show whether there are complications from the subsequent vaccination. Some complications overlap with others. And there are many such cases when, after vaccination, a child either died or remained disabled for life. Information about all this is kept silent - it means money is involved and someone benefits from it!”

Larisa Barinova says that at the time of vaccination the baby was absolutely healthy. He tolerated the previous two DPT vaccinations well. By the evening of October 3, the boy’s temperature rose and snot appeared, but by the morning of the next day, Rostislav’s condition, according to his mother, returned to normal.

It worsened again on the night of October 9: the boy vomited. Larisa Barinova decided that this was due to complementary feeding: the day before she fed her son more broccoli puree than usual.

On the morning of the 9th, when the woman realized that her child’s condition was deteriorating, she turned to doctors for help. It was not possible to save the baby. The Ministry of Health of the Kaluga Region and the Investigative Committee are currently conducting an investigation into this fact.

The Internet public, meanwhile, has already drawn its own conclusions. Many social network users, like Larisa Barinova, believe that the cause of the child’s death was the DTP vaccine. We decided to find out how justified these suspicions are.

Agreed to comment on the situation famous Russian pediatrician Sergei BUTRY. He lives and works in Ivanovo, and on his pages on the social networks Facebook and VKontakte he covers in detail topics that are relevant to parents: vaccinations, vitamins, treatment of colds, etc.

Despite his busy work schedule: Sergei Butriy works 11 hours a day, he found time to give a detailed commentary on the tragedy that happened in Kaluga, as well as on whether the DTP vaccine is as scary as vaccine opponents make it out to be. Sergei Butriy accompanied each of his arguments with a link to primary sources.

The DPT vaccination could not directly or indirectly provoke pneumonia, says Sergei Butriy. – DTP – a vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis component – ​​is perhaps the most reactogenic vaccine in the entire national vaccination calendar, that is, it most often causes undesirable effects: local (redness, pain and swelling of the injection site) and systemic (fever, malaise, sometimes even febrile seizures).

Because of this, parents are more wary of the DPT vaccine than any other, and because of this, the DPT vaccine has been the subject of an incredible amount of research into its safety. The vaccine was suspected of a variety of “sins”: that it provokes sudden infant death syndrome, persistent encephalopathy, epilepsy, dementia, etc. All reasonable suspicions that concerned only lesions of the central nervous system were carefully studied in rigorous studies, and the cause-and-effect relationship was refuted. Millions of dollars and pounds were spent on this, after which the vaccine was rehabilitated and these suspicions were removed from it.

So, even the most aggressive critics of this vaccine never suspected that it could cause pneumonia. There is not a single scientific evidence of such a connection. Neither the official instructions for the DTP vaccine, nor the most detailed professional analyzes of its adverse reactions anywhere, even in half a word, mention the possibility of causing pneumonia. Therefore, we must recognize that the tragedy that occurred cannot be related to the introduction of the vaccine.

- How complex (so to speak) is DPT? Is it easy for children to tolerate? Are there any contraindications for this vaccination? Is the local doctor required to prescribe urine or blood tests before vaccination to make sure that the child is healthy? How should a child be examined immediately before vaccination?

I have already said that unwanted reactions (not to be confused with complications) to the DTP vaccine occur quite often. For example, an increase in temperature above 38°C on the third dose of DPT occurs in almost every second child (see. directory Immunoprophylaxis 2014, p. 79). However, these undesirable effects are not too high a price to pay for protecting a child from tetanus, whooping cough and diphtheria. Of course, there are contraindications for the DTP vaccine. These are primarily severe and progressive neurological disorders, afebrile seizures, acute infectious diseases and exacerbations of chronic diseases, etc. (see details). As far as I know about the tragedy in Kaluga from open sources, the doctor examined the child and excluded these contraindications, which means he not only had the right, but also had to administer the vaccine. No regulatory document in the Russian Federation obliges a doctor to monitor blood and urine tests before vaccination in order to prevent complications from it, and this is correct. Because these complications are completely impossible to predict from tests or anything else. The current practice of prescribing tests for each child before each vaccination has no scientific basis and can only serve as some irrational way to reassure parents who are afraid of vaccination.

The examination of the child before vaccination is carried out like any other examination by a pediatrician, and if no obvious diseases are detected, according to the law of the Russian Federation, the doctor not only can, but must also vaccinate the child. More and more evidence is accumulating around the world that vaccinating sick children does not carry with it either an increased risk of complications from vaccination or an increased risk of complications from the disease itself (for example, see), but these recommendations have not yet reached Russia. In our country, even a minor ARVI is a contraindication to vaccinating a child. And even these overly cautious rules, as far as I know, were followed by the pediatrician.

- In your opinion, what is the degree of guilt in the incident of the local pediatrician who gave the go-ahead for the vaccination?

Considering everything I said above – none. A pediatrician is not a psychic; he cannot predict the future. He acted in the interests of the child, because he wanted to protect him from three very serious infections, the epidemiological situation for which in the Russian Federation is still unfavorable. He had no reason to expect complications from the vaccine - especially since this child had already been given the same DTP vaccine twice, and, according to the mother, it was well tolerated. And, I emphasize, the pediatrician turned out to be right: no complications developed from the vaccine. Pneumonia cannot in any way be considered a complication of DTP, because such complications with this vaccine have not been described in principle and because complications develop in the first hours or 2-3 days from the administration of the vaccine, and not on the sixth day.

If a child died in an accident after receiving DTP vaccination, would this be a complication? What if he fell out of the window? You understand that there is no connection between falling from a window and DTP, even if it happened immediately after vaccination? It’s the same with pneumonia and death from it. Yes, this is a terrible tragedy, and I sincerely - as a doctor and as a father of two children - sympathize with this family. But the fact that the vaccination took place the day before is purely an accident, and the accusations against the local pediatrician and the vaccine are groundless, irrational and unfair.

Judging by the mother's description, which she posted for public discussion, the child suffered aspiration of vomit, which caused aspiration pneumonia, respiratory failure and the death of the child. In my opinion, this is not the fault of the mother, the pediatrician, or the vaccine.

- Some parents, after the tragedy, are worried that their children may also become victims of vaccination. How justified are these fears? Can parents do anything to ensure that vaccination does not have any negative consequences for the child?

Any negative event after vaccination, whether related or unrelated to it, always immediately comes under the closest public attention. This provokes a wave of publications in the media and social networks, mass refusals of vaccinations and sweeping accusations towards doctors and vaccine manufacturers. At the same time, cases when a child was not vaccinated on time and he fell ill, for example, with whooping cough, are discussed a couple of orders of magnitude more modestly and less frequently. Why do you think this happens? Because parents feel guilty and try to shut up and forget this incident. This imbalance in public awareness is what gives rise to anti-vaccination sentiments. On the one hand, there are regular messages on social networks about tragedies that coincided with vaccination (like the case under discussion), or true adverse reactions to the vaccine, on the other hand, there is silence about the consequences of refusal to vaccinate. This is unfair and dangerous. People should be told how many vaccine-preventable infections there are in the Russian Federation, how many children suffer and die from them. It is worth at least as wide coverage of cases of child death from tetanus, pertussis pneumonia, measles, pneumococcal meningitis, and so on - that is, from those infections that vaccinations protect against. So that parents are aware of the arguments on both sides.

The bad news is that the risk of adverse events and complications from vaccinations cannot be reduced in advance. Postponing vaccination to a later date not only increases the time that a child will be defenseless against vaccine-preventable diseases, but, according to some studies, even worsens the tolerability of vaccination.

No matter how cynical it may sound, tragedies have always happened to children, and, unfortunately, will continue to happen. Some of these tragedies will continue to occur after vaccination, simply because children are vaccinated frequently and the risk of coincidences is quite high.

In his book Deadly Choices, pediatrician Paul Offit cites a case in which a father once brought his child to the family doctor for vaccination, waited in the waiting room for more than an hour and went home, upset by the long line. At home, he put the child to bed, and a few hours later he found him dead in his crib. An autopsy showed that the child died from sudden infant death syndrome. This father later said that if the pediatrician had administered the vaccine to his child, not a single study in the world would have been able to convince him that the vaccine killed the child.

Anyone who works with children, especially a local pediatrician, is at great risk. Anything bad that happens to a child can be blamed on the pediatrician: both by the public and by the imperfect judicial system. But if this is the price for working in pediatrics, who would want to work in pediatrics anyway?

By unfair persecution, you harass doctors, provoke their burnout, and push them to leave the profession and do something much safer and more profitable. And those who remain in the profession begin to constantly play it safe, since unjustified medical exemptions from vaccinations do not lead to sanctions against the doctor, but an administered vaccine always does

The other day I came across a statement on the Internet by an official from the Ministry of Health that there are no deaths from vaccinations in our country. I can even quote: “if we take statistics for the country as a whole, it turns out that for the country’s 146 million population there are from 200 to 600 vaccine complications per year and, fortunately, not a single death occurs. Which already speaks for itself and about the true scope of harm from vaccinations...” But why then do children die?

And yesterday, our neighbors’ son died after getting a flu shot. DIED!!! The boy burned to death in three days. True, as always, it was not the doctors or the vaccines that were to blame. The parents were named as culprits. They overlooked the fact that the child was vaccinated when he was sick and had a fever.

Think about it: parents!!! And not the doctors who vaccinated a boy with a fever.

Forums are filled with information about the negative consequences of vaccinations. True, doctors call them a “natural” reaction of the body, which may be different for each child. And only some doctors dare to speak out against it. An example can be viewed at http://news-today.rf/. The story of the ordeals of a neurologist who dared to give medical advice from vaccinations to children with various developmental pathologies is characteristic in itself: it is not easy for even specialists to withstand the “mainstream”.

Moreover, this is a site that is “for” vaccinations!

Only a few experts call for great caution regarding the practice of introducing foreign biological materials into the human body. But doctors treat vaccinations themselves with much greater caution. So, last year at the Military Medical Academy in St. Petersburg, 610 doctors refused vaccination against hepatitis B. On average, the refusal rate for all clinics participating in the vaccination program was 21.6%. A fifth of doctors did not want to get vaccinated! And even if this applies to one vaccine, doesn’t the fact itself tell us a lot?

It would be a great exaggeration to say that science is gradually starting to vote against vaccinations. Nevertheless, there is such a thing. Look, if interested, http://www.vitamarg.com/: 25 arguments against vaccinations and interviews with Galina Petrovna Chervonskaya- a famous virologist, candidate of biological sciences, independent expert on virology, author of four monographs on the problems of vaccinations.

So what should we do? Well, some kind of measles or even diphtheria, which, if diagnosed in a timely manner, can be treated quite successfully with modern means. Or the flu, which is more or less easily tolerated even without vaccination. But what if refusing the mumps vaccine will lead to mumps and further infertility for the boy? What if refusal to vaccinate against polio leads to fatal consequences after a visit to seemingly harmless Bulgaria, Greece or Turkey with their constant foci of corresponding infections?

What will console us is if a child is not vaccinated and gets a disease that will cripple him for the rest of his life? Or complications that supposedly “occur in one or less cases per million vaccinated people” - if they affect my child?

And will it be much easier for us if not complications arise, but “features of the reactivity of the child’s body”: rash, urticaria, anaphylactic shock (!), convulsions, severe headaches, a piercing long-lasting cry for hours?.. Doctors say that “ it is almost impossible to predict the appearance of such individual reactions”... Some will not experience it at all, while others will experience it in the first 4 to 12 hours. Well, convulsions and loss of consciousness are possible from 2-7 to 4-15 days after the vaccine is administered!
The feeling that something is wrong with vaccinations has been building up in society for years. The result is already visible. On average, only 75% of children in the country are vaccinated in accordance with the national vaccination schedule. In large cities - even less.

Doctors claim that the effectiveness of vaccination is achieved only with 95 percent coverage. Consequently, the approach to vaccinating the population is already not justified - and it will only get worse.

In my opinion, the only way out of the situation is to stop lying, stop hushing up cases of complications, stop referring to favorable statistics. With growing public awareness, this will work less and less.

Independent research into the effectiveness and consequences of total vaccination is needed. A study that both society and doctors would believe - and a corresponding adjustment of public policy in this area. I cannot formulate the criteria for such a study, since I am not a doctor.

But maybe experts will speak on this topic? If the state is unable to clearly respond to this request from society, representatives of this society need to try to do it themselves. And we will help bring this point of view “where it needs to be.”

About the possible connection between vaccination and autism and the dangers of heavy metals in vaccines, about the greed of pharmaceutical companies, see http://mnogodetok.ru/ (by the way, as it turned out, at least in this respect a number of Russian vaccines are much safer than imported ones).
http://homeoint.ru/
https://www.babyblog.ru/

But this was the case in Kirov. The parents of a 4-year-old girl refused to give her Mantu, which resulted in a year and a half struggle with the management of the kindergarten, with threats to drop the child off. The debate ended in the courtroom. Guess whose side the Kirov Themis took? That's right, on the kindergarten side. And this is not an isolated case when such an issue is resolved in court. And always - not in favor of the child. However, in many cases the matter ends with banal blackmail, saying that if you don’t get vaccinated, you will lose your place.

The investigative authorities of Mordovia are checking information that in early December a child died in Saransk, who was vaccinated in November, after which his health worsened.

As reported by the Investigation Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, the deceased girl, whose age was one year and nine months, was vaccinated with DTP (adsorbed pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus vaccine) at the end of November, in a clinic at her place of residence. After some time, the girl became ill, and she was hospitalized first in the infectious diseases hospital and then in the children's republican hospital. On December 3, despite the medical care provided, the girl died in the intensive care unit of the hospital.

During the inspection, investigators must check the actions of medical workers for signs of a crime under Art. 293 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“Negligence”). Based on the results of the inspection, a procedural decision will be made, according to the website of the Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee for Mordovia.

According to the child's relatives, the cause of the baby's death was the negligent actions of doctors. According to her mother, a 22-year-old resident of Saransk, the child was born healthy and was the first and only one in the family.

“When the baby was one year and nine months old, the local doctor invited us for DTP vaccination. On November 18, the girl was examined and sent to the treatment room, where she was vaccinated. At first there were no signs of deterioration in health. But a week later, my daughter began to have diarrhea, her stomach was swollen, and her legs were swollen. We suspected food poisoning and called the pediatrician home on November 24th. He said that there was nothing wrong with this, advising treatment with chamomile infusion. But my girl’s condition continued to deteriorate, and we called an ambulance. After this, our child was hospitalized in the infectious diseases hospital. There they diagnosed him with an intestinal infection of unknown origin. Doctors began to relieve intoxication. And then it was diagnosed that the child had developed kidney failure. After that we were sent to the Republican Children's Hospital. There the child underwent surgery and began to purify the blood using dialysis. They didn’t let us see him, but they said that the tests were normal. And on December 3 they announced that she had died,” the mother of the deceased girl told the StolisaS newspaper on December 5.

As the publication writes, information about the death of a child due to vaccination quickly spread throughout the city. Many young mothers have developed a fear of vaccination. The fact is that the vaccination is done four times in the first year of life, usually starting at three months of age. It is characterized by a high percentage of complications and increased allergenicity.

A similar case occurred at the beginning of 2009 in the Kaliningrad region, when a three-month-old child died after vaccination. As the investigative authorities reported, the girl was vaccinated with DPT and also vaccinated against polio. Before the procedure, the girl was examined by a local doctor; there were no indications against vaccination or vaccination. But 20 minutes after the procedure she died. An autopsy was unable to determine the girl's cause of death. The preliminary diagnosis made by forensic experts: “sudden infant death syndrome.” A week later, the Ministry of Health of the Kaliningrad Region stated that it had found no violations on the part of the doctors.

As TASS reports, today the Russian National Vaccination Calendar provides for the vaccination of children with 12 vaccines against a variety of infections. These are vaccinations against viral hepatitis B, pneumococcal infection, diphtheria, whooping cough, tetanus, polio, Haemophilus influenzae, measles, rubella, mumps and tuberculosis.

However, the expert council on health care under the Federation Council Committee on Social Policy in December 2014 called for expanding the National Vaccination Calendar by another three or four positions - to the international level. Deputy Chairman of the Federation Council Committee on Social Policy Igor Chernyshev said that “there should be approximately 15-16 types (of vaccinations).”

At the same meeting of the Expert Council on Health Care under the Federation Council Committee on Social Policy, proposals were made to introduce penalties, including dismissal, against doctors who support parents who oppose vaccination of their children. In addition, a proposal was made to introduce strict measures against adult citizens who do not want to be vaccinated: those who did not get vaccinated but contracted the infection were asked not to pay sick leave. For example, in the USA there is such a practice - medical insurance does not pay for those patients who ignore vaccination.

However, the press secretary of the Ministry of Health, Oleg Salagai, has already stated that the department does not plan to introduce any sanctions against doctors who support the “anti-vaccination sentiments” of parents and “myths about vaccination.” “Vaccination must be carried out taking into account the patient’s condition, the presence of indications and contraindications for it. Only this approach will reduce both the number of infectious diseases and the number of post-vaccination complications. Therefore, we see the solution to the problem of vaccination not in dismissal, but rather in explaining modern scientific data - both to the practicing doctor and to the patient,” Salagay said.

The report shows that some combination vaccines for children cause sudden death, but the company hides and disguises this fact in official safety reports.

There was a concealment of the truth in the documents for the combination vaccine Infanrix Hexa(a combination of diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, inactivated polio and haemophilus influenzae type b) produced by the company GSK, and Prevenar 13 produced by the company Pfizer and for a number of other vaccines. Reports suggested that dozens of sudden deaths after vaccination were not related to Infanrix Hexa. In the presented GSK The data was distorted by the time elapsed after the vaccine was administered, but the actual time elapsed after vaccination shows that the vaccine was, in fact, directly related to death.

As they say, “the devil is in the details,” and in this case, GSK gets those details wrong. Instead of indicating that death occurred within 10 days of vaccination, the reports indicate that death occurred after 10 days. By doing this, the pharmaceutical giant made it appear as if the sudden deaths occurred over a much longer period of time than they actually did. This was supposed to serve as proof that the vaccination was not involved in the sudden death of the child.

Table 36 in GlaxoSmithKline Biological Clinical Safety and report Pharmacovigilance reports sent to the Regulatory Authority show that almost all of the 67 reported deaths since the introduction Infanrix Hexa occurred within the first 10 days. And only two of these deaths occurred after 10 days. And GSK said all the deaths occurred randomly over a 20-day period, hinting that the cases were merely coincidental.

“If we analyze the data by looking at deaths in the first 10 days after vaccine administration and compare them with deaths in the next 10 days, it becomes clear that 97% of deaths (65 deaths) in infants under 1 year of age occur in the first 10 days and 3% ( 2 deaths) will occur in the next 10 days,” explains Child Health Safety. “Similarly, in children over 1 year of age, 87.5% of deaths (7 deaths) occurred in the first 10 days and 12.5% ​​(1 death) occurred in the next 10 days.”

90% of sudden vaccine deaths occurred within five days of vaccination

Taking a closer look at the data tables that GSK deliberately withheld from the public domain reveals an even more shocking fact - the vast majority of sudden vaccine deaths actually occurred within five days of the introduction of the Infanrix Hexa vaccine, further confirming its involvement. Shockingly, 90% of deaths (60 deaths) occurred within five days of vaccination. And 75% of deaths occurred within three days of vaccination.

“Clustering of deaths by timing of vaccination demonstrates an association between vaccination and sudden death,” added Child Health Safety. “This indicates that it is no coincidence that the pharmaceutical giant spread out deaths over a full 20 days, rather than showing the total number of deaths for each day after vaccination. Company GlaxoSmithKline hid clustering of deaths throughout the post-vaccination period.”

You may not know, but the pharmaceutical company GSK has already been fined $3 billion for promoting the off-label use of antidepressants. The case has been dubbed the largest hush-hush healthcare fraud in US history, which speaks volumes about the company's sanctity.

If GSK is never found guilty of deliberately withholding important safety data that could have saved children from dying publicly, there is a good chance it could do something similar again, earning itself the title of the most shameful, greedy and the speculative corporation in the world (slightly falling short of Monsanto, of course).

If pharmaceutical companies really help people, why don't they develop treatments to treat the disease instead of vaccines?

There is one big problem with vaccination programs designed to protect all children from infectious diseases that may never occur. It is that the weakest children always end up suffering - or dying. A better approach, at least from a humane perspective, would be to develop effective treatments for these diseases. To treat only those children who are sick, and not to use preventive “treatment” of everyone, both healthy and sick, with the help of vaccines.

This would be the expected and correct approach if Western medicine is truly aimed at preventing the spread of disease and promoting public health. But the sad truth is that health care is not a priority - profit is the only priority. Vaccines are entirely a "guessing game" because no one can ever really know how the human body will react to them.

“To date, effective treatments have been developed for major well-known childhood diseases,” explains Child Health Safety. “This is a scandal in the scientific 21st century. If effective treatments are available, there is no need for vaccines."

And it is precisely because vaccines will become obsolete that the pharmaceutical industry continues to pretend to make drugs instead of actually making drugs. Vaccines are the main source of income for the pharmaceutical industry, which are currently paid for by the government (at taxpayer expense), so-called "emergency" vaccines, many of which never stop production.

“Educated parents can either steer their children away from harmful paths or continue to live in one of the greatest deceptions in history. "Vaccines are full of heavy metals, viruses, mycoplasma, fecal material, DNA fragments from other species, formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (a sterilizing agent) - a miracle of modern medicine," wrote Andrew Baker on NSNBC.me.

"Children begin to complain of muscle pain. Over time, it turns out that the child cannot stand on his feet. This is post-vaccination paralysis, although no one makes such diagnoses. It may go away on its own or after treatment, or it may remain. In hospitals, children are fed pills, given IVs, and released with a diagnosis of ARVI. Therefore, there is nowhere to get correct statistics", the doctor emphasizes.

Also, according to Kolomiets, meningitis can develop - either as a manifestation or as a post-vaccination complication. The doctor associates the increase in the incidence of meningitis in Ukraine with the start of the vaccination campaign.

“Where else can patients with meningitis get such quantities?! Inflammation of the meninges is indicated in the side effects. This is one of the manifestations,” says the doctor.

DOCTORS EVALUATED THE CHILD'S CONDITION

According to Oleg Nazar, director of the Kyiv Center for Clinical Immunology, deaths recorded in the period after vaccination cannot be directly associated with vaccination.

“To clearly say that there was a death from a vaccine, there must be a classic anaphylactic shock - an allergic reaction after administration of the vaccine. Everything else is a possible exacerbation of the conditions that existed. For example, chronic infection or inflammation,” says the doctor.

Explains that any vaccination is an activation of the immune system, and as a result, increased inflammation.

“All hidden diseases come out. Vaccinations simply aggravate them. But if there were no vaccination, there would be a cold, acute respiratory viral infection, flu. The disease would still manifest itself,” the immunologist emphasizes.