Advertising on the portal

In which country are parties banned? In which countries is the communist party banned?

The choice of ideology has forever divided people. For young people, for the most part, this is just a question of belonging to one subculture or another, but for people, actions are significant differences that do not allow them to make contact. In this article we will tell you in which countries there is communism now, in which video it exists.

Pluralism of opinions

The feudal system had one significant advantage:

  • Most of the population was deprived of basic rights;
  • The average peasant thought much more about his dinner than about politics;
  • The existing state of affairs was taken for granted;
  • There wasn't much disagreement.

A miserable existence in harsh conditions is a dubious prospect. But if you remember the number of people killed in civil wars around the world, this will no longer seem like such a drawback of a bygone era. A hundred years ago, similar “political debates” took place on our territory, when the following arguments were used:

  1. Artillery;
  2. Cavalry;
  3. Fleet;
  4. Gallows;
  5. Firing squads.

And both sides did not disdain massive “reductions in numbers” of the enemy, so it’s not even possible to blame any specific ideology. The very debate, the very belief in the possibility of establishing a better system can turn a person into a cruel creature.

Theoretical structure of the state

In fact, communism remained only on the pages of theoretical works on political life and government. There has never been communism in any country in the world, although they tried to build it:

  • Ensure social equality;
  • Introduce public ownership of the means of production;
  • Get rid of the monetary system;
  • Leave class divisions behind;
  • Create perfect production forces.

To put it very roughly, communism implies that the existing production capacity is enough to provide everything necessary for every person on the planet, without exception. Everyone can receive:

  1. Necessary medications;
  2. Good nutrition;
  3. Modern technology;
  4. Necessary clothing;
  5. Movable and immovable property.

It turns out that it is only necessary to “correctly” distribute all available goods so as not to “offend” anyone. Everyone will receive exactly as much as they need. But for this it is necessary to “take control” of every production on the planet, taking it away from the current owners. And already at this moment you may encounter insurmountable difficulties. What can we say about equal and fair distribution, which the history of mankind does not know and, most likely, will never know.

Countries of victorious communism

There are countries that are trying or have tried to build communism on their territory:

  • USSR (collapsed in 1991);
  • China;
  • Cuba;
  • North Korea;
  • Vietnam;
  • Kampuchea (dissolved in 1979);
  • Laos.

In many ways, the influence was exerted by the Union, which exported ideology and control mechanisms. For this he received his share of influence on events within the country. Today The most successful country with a ruling communist party is China. But even this Asian country:

  1. We moved away from the ideas of “classical communism”;
  2. Allow the possibility of the existence of private property;
  3. Have been liberalized in recent years;
  4. They strive to attract as many foreign investors as possible through openness and transparency of business.

It is difficult to talk about total state control in such conditions. Things are a little different in Cuba and North Korea. These countries do not abandon the path laid out in the second half of the last century, although movement along this road causes serious difficulties:

  • Sanctions;
  • Militarism;
  • Threats of invasion;
  • Difficult economic situation.

These regimes, without significant changes, can last for a very long time - there is enough safety margin. Another question is whether this will benefit the people living in these territories.

European socialists

To countries with a strong social program can be attributed:

  1. Denmark;
  2. Sweden;
  3. Norway;
  4. Switzerland.

Everything that our grandparents dreamed of, the Swedes were able to bring to life. It's about:

  • About high social standards;
  • On state protection;
  • About decent wages;
  • About a healthy microclimate.

In 2017, a referendum was held in Switzerland on a guaranteed payment to citizens of a certain amount each month. These funds would have been enough for a comfortable existence, but the Swiss refused. And all without communist parties, Lenin and red stars.

It turns out that there can be a highly developed state that cares about the well-being of its own citizens and considers this value as its highest priority. Requirements for such a country:

  1. High labor productivity;
  2. Lack of ambitions for world domination;
  3. Long traditions;
  4. Strong and independent institutions of government and civil rights.

Any attempts to prove one’s uniqueness or impose opinions on other countries lead to a decrease in the role of civil society in public life, which results in strong states with weak social programs.

Where is “good living” now?

There is no real communism in the world. Perhaps something similar existed among our ancestors, during the primitive communal system. In modern times, communist regimes rule:

  • In China;
  • In the DPRK;
  • In Cuba.

A number of European countries respect social policy, although there is not a bust of Lenin in every office:

  1. Switzerland;
  2. Norway;
  3. Denmark;
  4. Sweden.

In some places, high living standards are ensured by oil income, in others by long-standing and successful investments. But one thing is constant - for “equality and fraternity” high labor productivity and good economic performance are required.

Building such a model is possible in any country in the world; for this it is not necessary to overthrow the current government and impose the power of the proletariat. It is enough to push the idea of ​​high social standards and make the task of improving the lives of citizens the main goal of the country.

Video about strange types of communism

In this video, political scientist Vyacheslav Volkov will talk about 4 unusual types of communism that existed previously and exist in our time:

In which countries of the world is the Communist Party banned? and got the best answer

Answer from Ping Pong[guru]
It was banned in Germany in 1956. They did the right thing.

Answer from Pedal horse[guru]
In civilized countries, the murder party is prohibited.


Answer from ArArAt*****[guru]
In South Africa, during the apartheid regime...


Answer from Nikolay Khomyakov[guru]
As far as I know, in Latvia.


Answer from Yergey Ivanov[guru]
Communist parties in 2011 are ruling in China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, and the DPRK (under the name of the Workers' Party of Korea).
They are members of the ruling coalitions in Cyprus, Italy, Nepal, and Uruguay.
Cuba Cuba (Communist Party of Cuba) (1959), the only legal party in that country
Democratic People's Republic of Korea DPRK (Workers' Party of Korea leads the United Democratic Fatherland Front) (1948)
People's Republic of China (Communist Party of China, heads the Patriotic United Front of the Chinese People); Hong Kong and Macau excluded from this system (1949)
Vietnam Vietnam (The Communist Party of Vietnam heads the Vietnamese Fatherland Front, en:Vietnamese Fatherland Front) (1976)
Laos Laos (The Lao People's Revolutionary Party heads the Lao Front for National Construction, en:Lao Front for National Construction) (1975)
Syria Syria (Syrian Communist Party is part of the National Progressive Front) (1963)
Moldova Moldova (The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova has a formal majority in parliament, but is not ruling)
Nepal Nepal (From August 2008 to March 2013, the prime ministers of Nepal were representatives of the communist parties (Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) and Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist-Leninist) (2008)
Uruguay Uruguay (The Communist Party of Uruguay is part of the Broad Front, a coalition uniting communists, socialists, Trotskyists, Christian Democrats, which has been in power in Uruguay since 2004. In the 2004 elections, the Broad Front received 51.7% of the votes and held 52 deputy out of 99. The President of Uruguay on March 1, 2010 was José Mujica, a former member of the Tupamaros (National Liberation Movement) guerrilla movement, a Marxist radical organization that used urban guerrilla methods in the armed struggle against the government) (2004)
South Africa Republic of South Africa - South African Communist Party
Ukraine Ukraine - Communist Party of Ukraine
Sri Lanka Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka - Communist Party of Sri Lanka
taken from the site


Answer from Vsevolod Korablev[guru]
in many Muslim countries such as Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain, in Myanmar and there are countries where it has never existed, all sorts of Fiji, Belize, etc. if it were banned in Russia, it would be just wonderful!


Answer from Walter[guru]
If it's banned, there's a reason for it. After the fact that the Communists sucked the blood out of half the world, it’s not surprising that they banned it.


Answer from Chernov Nikita[newbie]
Communist parties are banned in countries where the ruling regime is a dictatorship, because communist parties oppose the exploitation of others

Just a few decades ago, the world communist movement was a powerful force that the leading countries of the world, including the United States, had to reckon with. Even during the “crusade against communism,” the communist parties remained the vanguard of the left.

Today the situation has changed dramatically. With the exception of China and a number of Asian countries, as well as Cuba, the influence of communist parties is practically invisible.

In a number of European countries, not only communist parties are banned, but also communist symbols. In the European Union, statements are increasingly being made that equate communism with fascism and national socialism, holding the communists responsible for inciting the Second World War.

But, despite the deep crisis, the communist movement is alive. And, most interestingly, in leading Western countries, communist parties continue to exist.

March of the French Communists, 1935. Photo: www.globallookpress.com

What do modern Western communists look like?

French Communist Party: there are traditions, no prospects

Italy and France were famous for their communist traditions - it was in these two countries that there were the strongest communist parties in Western Europe in the post-war period.

Beginning in the 1980s, the communists, caught in ideological contradictions, ceded the role of the main left party in the country to the socialists. The collapse of the USSR hit the PCF very seriously. Robert Yu, who replaced long-time leader Georges Marchais, initiated a departure from traditional ideology and accepted ecologists, feminists, and fighters for the rights of sexual minorities into the ranks of the organization. A split emerged in the party, as a result of which many members went to the socialists and other leftist organizations.

In the 1997 parliamentary elections, the French Communist Party, gaining 9.9 percent of the vote, entered the ruling coalition with the Socialists. As a result, for the last time in the post-war history of France, a government was formed in which communists received ministerial positions.

Following this, there was a new decline in the popularity of the communists, forcing them to enter into coalitions with other radical leftists.

In the 2012 parliamentary elections, the PCF was part of the Left Front, which won 10 of the 577 seats in the National Assembly. Seven out of ten seats belong to the communists.

Since 2010, the leader of the French Communist Party has been journalist Paul Laurent.

Italian Communist Party: with hope of revival

Italian Communist Party, during the fascist regime Mussolini which led an armed struggle against him, after the end of World War II had every chance of becoming the ruling power in the country. In 1947-1948, the communists were part of the Italian government. However, pressure from external anti-communist forces, primarily the United States, led to the fact that the communists' opportunities in real politics were limited.

After the entry of Soviet troops into Afghanistan, cooperation between the Italian Communist Party and the USSR was virtually curtailed.

The collapse of the USSR put an end to the history of the party. The 20th Congress of the PCI transformed it into the Democratic Party of Left Forces (DPLS), which joined the Socialist International.

The party first switched to social democratic positions, and then completely became centrist, adopting the name “Democratic Party”.

Those who did not agree with the transformation of the PCI in 1991 created the “Communist Revival Party”. In 1998, a new split occurred in the party, as a result of which the Party of Italian Communists was created.

In 2014 it was renamed the Communist Party of Italy, and in 2016, after reunification with a number of new breakaways from the PCV, it was transformed into the Italian Communist Party, adopting the name of the historical PCI.

Things are not going well for the Italian Communist Party in its new reincarnation, and for all other small communist groups.

In the 2013 parliamentary elections, not a single communist party entered parliament. Only members of small groups who joined the Left Ecology Freedom party, which, in turn, entered into a coalition with former communists from the Democratic Party, were able to “infiltrate” there.

Since 2016, he has headed the Italian Communist Party Mauro Alboresi. The organization's membership does not exceed 20,000 people. In its best years, the PCI had 2,000,000 members.

Communists of Italy after success in the 1972 elections. Photo: www.globallookpress.com

Communist Party of Austria: small but staunch and proud

Unlike Germany, where the activities of the Communist Party are officially prohibited, Austrian communists have been freely active since 1945. Founded in 1918, today the party is one of the oldest communist organizations in Europe.

It is curious that thanks to the Austrian communists, the first Soviet football player appeared, playing for a club in Western Europe. Anatoly Zinchenko in 1980 he received permission to play for Rapid Vienna, since this club had close ties with the Communist Party of Austria.

The Austrian communists were represented in the country's parliament from 1945 to 1959, after which they failed to achieve success in federal elections. And from 1970 to 2005, communists were not represented in local parliaments. However, the Austrian Communist Party did not cease to exist.

In the November 25, 2012 elections to the city council of Graz, which is a bastion of the party, the KPA received 19.86% of the votes and 10 seats out of 48, which allowed the Austrian communists to form the second largest faction after the Austrian People's Party.

In the 2013 parliamentary elections, the Austrian Communist Party received 1 percent of the votes, and again did not win seats in parliament.

The party is currently led by Mirko Messner And Melina Knauss.

The Spanish Communist Party: the force that the EU fears

The Spanish communists left a deep mark on the history of our country. Many of them, after the defeat in the Civil War of 1936-1939, lived and worked in the Soviet Union.

Son of the leader of the Spanish communists Dolores Ibarruri Ruben Ibarruri became an officer in the Red Army and died a heroic death in the battles of Stalingrad.

Before the fall of the regime Franco Spanish communists in their homeland operated illegally. Many of them were shot or died in prison. The party was again legalized in 1977, and in its first parliamentary elections received 9.33% of the votes, taking 3rd place.

Like other European communist parties, the party did not avoid splits, but was able to remain an influential political force.

In the 2016 elections, the communists were in the Unidos-Podemos coalition, which showed an excellent result, collecting more than 5 million votes and receiving 71 parliamentary seats.

A situation arose in which the Unidos-Podemos coalition, in alliance with the Spanish Socialist Workers' Party, could form a government. However, official Brussels sharply objected to this. The reason was not only the possibility of communists entering the government, but also the fact that Unidos-Podemos acts from the position of “Euroscepticism”. As a result, the government was formed by the right-wing People's Party, which did not have a majority.

The leader of the Spanish communists is Jose Luis Centella.

Spanish communists, 1936. Photo: www.globallookpress.com

Communist Party USA: for Leninism, gays and against Trump

It’s hard to believe, but not only are there communists in the USA, but their headquarters are located not just anywhere but in the “capital of world imperialism” - New York.

American communists, who were subjected to persecution and repression for decades, showed enviable resilience. In the 1980s, the US Communist Party opposed Soviet perestroika, for which it was deprived Mikhail Gorbachev financial support. In 1991, amid the collapse of the USSR, a split occurred in the party. The minority, which demanded a rejection of the ideology of Leninism, formed the Liaison Committees for Democracy and Socialism, and the majority maintained its previous course.

At the same time, the party is focused on a peaceful and democratic transition to a socialist economic system in the United States and declares its refusal to use violent methods to overthrow the existing system.

Despite loyalty to Leninism, the program of the American Communist Party contains rather unexpected theses. For example, that capitalism, through the media, which are under the monopoly power of corporations, uses sexism, national chauvinism, homophobia, anti-Semitism and anti-communism in order to divide the working class and its allies.

Current US communists are fighting for the rights of sexual and gender minorities. “Workers around the world strive for a life without war, exploitation, inequality, and poverty. They strive to build a bright future based on democracy, peace, justice, equality, cooperation and meeting the basic needs of people. This future is socialism, a system in which workers control their own lives and destinies and build a better world together. The Communist Party USA is dedicated to the fight for socialism in this country. This document is the program of our Party, a statement of our goals and objectives, as well as a guide to action on the path to the Socialist United States of America,” the Communist Party program says.

Since 2014, the party has been headed by a 60-year-old John Batchell. The party size is approximately 2000 people.

Although communists say they intend to achieve their goals through democratic means, the last time a Communist Party candidate entered the presidential race was 1984. Behind Gus Hall and went with him as a candidate for vice president Angela Davis 36,386 voters, or 0.04 percent, voted.

“The Communist Party does not support candidates from other parties, but we are deeply involved in mobilizing people to participate in elections,” the party website says.

In the 2016 election race, American communists mobilized people in support of Hillary Clinton. Currently, the US Communist Party is actively participating in street protests against the new president Donald Trump.

The vacated left niche will be filled with more radical elements, and the quality of decisions made by managers will drop even more.

The day before, the leader of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, condemned communism and accused the Communist Party of all mortal sins. A new detail appeared in his traditional anti-communist appeal - they say that all members of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation should be convicted under Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for extremism.

“They disfigured the country, deceived all of humanity, millions of people died, stupid ideas. We need to curse the word “communism” and everyone who is a member of this kind of left-wing organizations today.”, Zhirinovsky said on September 6 at a press conference at the central office of the Interfax agency.

“Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation must apply to the entire Communist Party of the Russian Federation”, he said and added that"The Communist Party must be banned."

Chairman of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation Gennady Zyuganov at first wisely refused to comment on “Storm” “all sorts of Zhirinovsky’s nonsense”. However, he later recalled that “they tried to ban the idea of ​​justice and friendship of peoples as soon as it arose.”

“The most fierce hater of communism was Hitler and his pack of fascists - Goebbels and Goering, but nothing came of it. It won’t work out for Zhirinovsky either. Therefore, send them away and tell them that any nonsense is not worthy of a basic comment,” the communist leader spoke sharply.

Zhirinovsky proposed banning communism

An attempt to ban the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and communist ideology has already been made in the modern history of the Russian Federation. Its main initiator is former member of the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee and the first President of Russia Boris Yeltsin.

A quarter of a century ago, on February 13-14, 1993, at the Second Extraordinary Congress of Communists of Russia, the Communist Party of the Russian Federation was formed as the restored Communist Party of the RSFSR. Previously, its activities were first suspended (August 23, 1991), and then completely banned in the country (November 6, 1991) by decree of the President of the RSFSR Boris Yeltsin, who had his own scores to settle with the communists - he was afraid that the Communist Party would be able to take revenge and to return power to one’s own hands, which Yeltsin took away with such difficulty. The central bodies of the party were dissolved, and the property was transferred to the state.

In October 1992, the party was restored on the basis of local party branches. At that time, the little-known secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the RSFSR for ideology, Gennady Zyuganov, the head of the Communist Party of the RSFSR, Valentin Kuptsov, and the representative of the CPSU in the Constitutional Court, Viktor Zorkaltsev, at the cost of incredible efforts, knocked out their right to exist.

In general, the entire period of the 90s was marked by a fierce struggle between one of the former leaders of the CPSU and the new president of the new Russia, Boris Yeltsin, with the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its leader Gennady Zyuganov. Yeltsin’s hatred of the communists was at the genetic level - in every conceivable and inconceivable way, the head of state tried to get rid of the attributes of a great Soviet power recognized even by the West.

Yeltsin’s anti-communist agenda was quite successfully intercepted by Vladimir Zhirinovsky, who never tires of kicking the communists on one issue or another.

Considering the certain wariness of the presidential administration regarding the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, which, although remaining within the framework of the system, is nevertheless beginning to behave somewhat more radically than it was before the announcement of the pension reform, it is not surprising that the main and almost Russia's only anti-communist Vladimir Zhirinovsky.

If we try to hypothetically imagine that the Kremlin will decide to ban the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, dissolve the party and repress its members, then only one conclusion can be drawn: the system has gone haywire and has completely lost touch with reality.

The presidential administration is dissatisfied with the growing influence of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Non-negotiable communists.

To ban a party that has multimillion-dollar support throughout the country, and is essentially and in fact the second political force in Russia, is to literally destabilize the political situation.

It is difficult to say what needs to happen in order for the top management to make a decision to abandon the Communist Party and artificially cease its existence. The party will disappear, but the idea will remain along with its followers, who will become even more radicalized than before. The liquidation of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation will definitely cause a very sharp rejection of at least every fifth Russian, if we take the support of the structure in society in the region of 20%.

Moreover, a whole political field will be freed up, which will not be empty for long, since the law of conservation of energy will come into play: somewhere it has gone, somewhere it has arrived. There will be no systemic opposition Communist Party of the Russian Federation - another, non-systemic radical left organization will appear, which will create even more problems for the authorities.

“The ban of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is a rather unpleasant thing for the presidential administration. The switch can click at any time and for any reason, but politics abhors a vacuum. If a niche that was previously occupied by a legal political force is vacated, it means that an illegal one will appear there. I understand that we like to experiment and believe that nothing is impossible, but this will still be too much.”, says Andrey Maksimov, vice-president of the Russian Association of Political Consultants.

According to current legislation, in order to suspend the state registration of a political party, it is necessary that its activities directly contradict the Constitution of Russia - be recognized as extremist, incite national and other discord in society, and so on.

That is, the authorities will have to recognize the very ideology of communism as extremist, which will be extremely difficult to do in conditions when Russia declared itself the legal successor of the Soviet Union, where communism was the state ideology.

Or the Communist Party of the Russian Federation must become extremely radicalized and call for the overthrow of the institutions of state power in the country, which is extremely difficult to imagine, at least in the still existing Russian realities.

The head of the Institute of Political Research, Sergei Markov, believes that Zhirinovsky’s statements about the need to ban communism and condemn party members under Article 282 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation are nothing more than pre-election PR.

However, if you even try to imagine that the authorities will make an attempt to actually ban the Communist Party, then in this case the presidential administration will make a gross administrative and political mistake.

Zyuganov put Zhirinovsky on a par with Hitler for trying to ban communism.

“It feels like they are withdrawn into themselves.. Channels of communication with society have dried up. The quality of political and personnel decisions made has fallen, and the number of unprofessional personal mistakes is constantly increasing. If you like a girl, then you should court her, not rape her. The authorities scalded the people with the pension reform, as if they poured boiling water from a kettle on them,” condemns the actions of the Markov authorities.

“The likelihood of a ban is extremely low - 2-3%, continues the political scientist. - But, if three or four more innovations are introduced, such as pension reform in its current form or the monetization of benefits, then public discontent will grow and, perhaps, the communists will become one of the leaders of this discontent. Then the ban on the Communist Party may happen.”

The leader of the LDPR, Vladimir Zhirinovsky, is a good actor who behaves in life somewhat differently than in front of the cameras - subtly, elegantly, politely. Such observations were shared with Storm by former high-ranking official of the presidential administration Andrei Kolyadin.

According to the political strategist, Zhirinovsky’s calls to ban the Communist Party and accuse its members of extremism are a simple show.

“It is not surprising that he finds only extremist notes in the communist movement. There is an old story: wherever a bee flies, it has honey everywhere, and wherever a fly flies, it has shit everywhere.”, - concludes Kolyadin.

I will not describe the history of the bans, but I will note that the Ukrainian authorities will be in good company.

It is quite natural that the fascists actively fought against the communists. In 1926, the Italian Communist Party was banned, and in January 1933, the German Communist Party. It is interesting, by the way, that Hitler did not consider it possible to ban the Communist Party just like that - with reference to the nature of its ideology and history. An arson was set on the Reichstag, which was blamed on the communists. Moreover, Georgiy Dimitrov was then brought to a public trial, they lost miserably and Dimitrov was released... However, the KKE was still banned, of the 300 thousand members of the KKE (at the beginning of 1933), about half were persecuted and thrown into prisons and concentration camps , tens of thousands killed.

Various nationalist regimes did not lag behind the fascists.

For example, Indonesia.

On the night of October 1, 1965, a coup attempt took place in Indonesia that became known as the September 30 Movement. Five high-ranking generals were kidnapped and killed by activists of Communist Party-affiliated youth organizations. The conspirators, supported by some of the officers of the presidential guard and the Air Force headquarters, announced the transfer of all power to the hands of the Revolutionary Council.

Control of the army passed to General Suharto, who crushed the uprising by October 2. The military accused the PKI of organizing a coup attempt. Evidence of the connection between the Communist Party and the September 30 Movement was indirect; there were assumptions that the uprising was organized by Suharto to seize power and organize reprisals against the PKI, or that the initiative was taken by the Air Force command, which competed with the leaders of the ground forces Suharto and Nasution. Soon, repressions against communists began throughout the country, about 500 thousand party members (actual and alleged) were killed, and the party was virtually destroyed. General Suharto removed President Sukarno from power and became the country's president in 1968.

Note that Suharto also needed a significant reason to ban the Communist Party. Although the case did not come to court.

Oh yes. 1991 The new democratic government, consisting entirely (or almost entirely) of communists, banned the CPSU. They were probably ashamed. I mean, I really wanted to stay in power and didn’t want anyone to control me. That’s what they did - instead of writing a statement about leaving the party, they banned the party itself and took away its property. And the truth - what is it?

Now they also don’t want to simply ban the Communist Party. The well-known radical politician Lyashko offers two reasons for the ban.

Firstly, it turns out that it was the Communist Party of Ukraine that organized the bloody dispersal of the Maidan. However, due to some oversight, she did not set fire to the Reichstag Rada. No, I like the idea with the Rada better - so what if it didn’t burn? There was no dispersal of the Maidan either. And the Communist Party of Ukraine is certainly not in any way involved in attempts to do at least something, simply because it has practically no influence on the authorities. Until now, the biggest success of the communists was forcing the leadership of parliament to put to a vote the issue of canceling the pension reform, which the opposition failed. That's why it's poslidovna.

Secondly, it turns out that the Communist Party of Ukraine recently held its 44th Congress, and this is reprehensible. Lyashko's party is lagging far behind and this confuses him.

You know, when I compare the scale of the personalities of Hitler, Suharto and even the “Belovezhskaya Troika” with Lyashko, I begin to experience cognitive dissonance. Truly, what a country, such are the terrorist attacks...